Special Measures Agreement Korea

In early 2019, South Korea and the United States were forced to sign a one-year SMA instead of the usual five years, amid persistent disagreements. But the short-term deal, in which South Korea agreed to pay an 8.2 percent more, or about 1.0389 trillion won ($920 million) a year, expired earlier this year without a new deal. President Donald Trump has said that South Korea should pay more, and differences of opinion have raised the prospect that it may at least withdraw some American troops, as he has done elsewhere. The ROK`s position is well received by the local public, but almost a non-departure for “real” negotiations. The confusing presentation of their position in the United States is equally problematic. In December 2019, in Seoul, the chief U.S. negotiator said publicly, “As parties to the agreement, we can amend the agreement if we agree to do it together. This is why the SMA agreement has been updated and modified over the years. This statement, as well as the United States` characterization of its position as an extension of the previous ADM, is misleading because “SMA” is not only an acronym for the “Special Measures Agreement” but for the agreement on specific measures regarding Article 5 of the facilities and territories and the status of U.S. forces in Korea (SOFA) agreement. Article 5 of SOFA deals only with “facilities and areas” for the USFK. The U.S. statement on its position ignores the fact that the United States must recognize that the current negotiations are inconsistent with the original spirit of the ADM in seeking costs beyond “facilities and areas” such as training, equipment and transportation.

This disparity gives the government some leeway on legal and procedural issues related to burden-sharing negotiations. However, the two countries have still not agreed on a broader agreement on cost allocation, which has led workers to get their ass kicked. South Korea and the United States are embroered in a nearly two-year dispute over how much each must pay to support the approximately 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea, a legacy of the 1950-53 Korean War, which ended with a ceasefire, not a peace treaty. Although the United States and the Republic of Korea (ROK) have made some progress in negotiating the Exceptional Measures Agreement (SMA), the two sides do not appear ready to engage in meaningful negotiations. The basic positions of the two countries remain totally different: the United States wants a negotiated agreement that reflects the total cost of ROC defence beyond the existing ADM, including transportation, training and equipment for the Korean Armed Forces (USFK), while the ROK tries to maintain the current framework of the SMA, which covers only three categories : the cost of labor for Korean workers in USFK, logistics costs and construction for USFK. “In the absence of a signed ADM or a related bilateral agreement, the USFK can be … Korean national employees will not begin until April 1. WASHINGTON – The Pentagon said Tuesday it had reached an agreement with South Korea on a proposal for Seoul to fund thousands of South Korean peripheral workers at U.S. bases that had been placed on unpaid leave earlier this year. The United States angered workers in South Korea in April after the two allies failed to sign a new cost-sharing agreement. The United States will host the Republic of Korea (ROK) from October 22-24 in Honolulu, Hawaii, for consultations on the Special Measures Agreement (ADM).

The SMA, a kind of burden-sharing agreement, is the mechanism with which the Republic of Korea shares the costs of US forces for the defence of the Republic of Korea. The United States has had ADMs with the Republic of Korea since 1991 and this new agreement will replace the existing SMA, which expires at the end of 2019.

Comments are closed.